Trump Advisers’ Signal Chat Reveals Sensitive Attack Plans Shared Ahead of Yemen Strikes

March 26, 2025 – Washington, D.C. – A major national security controversy has erupted after The Atlantic revealed that senior officials in the Trump administration shared operational military details—including attack timing—via an unsecured Signal group chat that mistakenly included The Atlantic’s editor in chief, Jeffrey Goldberg. Despite official denials, the messages expose a potential breach just hours before U.S. airstrikes on Houthi targets in Yemen.

Trump Signal chat leak

Leaked Signal Messages Reveal Attack Timelines

At the center of the incident is a Signal group titled “Houthi PC small group,” allegedly created by National Security Adviser Michael Waltz. Among its participants were Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. The group also inadvertently included Goldberg due to a misdirected invitation.

A key message, sent at 11:44 a.m. ET on March 15, detailed real-time strike operations:

  • “1215et: F-18s LAUNCH (1st strike package)”

  • “1345: ‘Trigger Based’ F-18 1st Strike Window Starts (Target Terrorist is @ his Known Location…)”

This message reached Goldberg 31 minutes before the strike began, and over two hours before the critical window to eliminate a primary Houthi target. Experts say that had the text reached adversarial hands, U.S. personnel could have been put in grave danger.

Officials Downplay, But Messages Show Operational Specifics

Officials have insisted no classified information was shared:

  • Pete Hegseth: “Nobody was texting war plans.”

  • Tulsi Gabbard: “There was no classified material.”

  • John Ratcliffe: “Communications were lawful and permissible.”

  • Donald Trump: “It wasn’t classified information.”

However, experts dispute this, noting that real-time military movements and airstrike schedules are typically classified, even if not marked as such. The Atlantic withheld publishing these details initially but reconsidered after administration officials publicly downplayed the messages.

White House and CIA Express Objections, Offer No Clarity

The White House acknowledged the messages were not classified but still objected to their publication. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said:

“This was intended to be a private deliberation amongst senior staff and sensitive information was discussed.”

The CIA asked The Atlantic not to publish the name of Ratcliffe’s chief of staff, which the publication agreed to honor. The rest of the texts were published unredacted, citing public interest and the threat posed by unsecured communications.

Security Experts Warn of Grave Risk

National security experts are alarmed by the breach, emphasizing that Signal, while encrypted, is not secure for operational military use—especially when the recipient list isn’t carefully vetted. The accidental inclusion of a journalist in a war planning chat raises deep concerns about internal communication protocols within the Trump administration.

BREAKING NEWS:
Jio’s Exciting 3 Plans: Unlimited Calling and Data for 90 Days! Thousands of Electric Cars Sold in May: Top 5 Revealed Big iPhone 17 Pro deal: Amazon Sale starts July 4!