New Delhi, Sep 27 (udaipur kiran) India moved to ban e-cigarettes as these new products were undermining tobacco control efforts, and the new forms of nicotine addiction would have only raised the economic burden on the country.
The pre-emptive move was also necessary because Juul, the largest e-cigarette brand, was planning to launch its products in India by the end of December, 2019.
“e-cigarettes are tools to introduce harm amongst the non-smokers. Being gateway products, they pose a huge risk of initiation of nicotine addiction among non-smokers, adolescent, youth and even children.
“There is also evidence to suggest serious adverse health effects of vaping even without nicotine. Proliferation of these new products can severely undermine our tobacco control efforts,” Harsh Vardhan, Union Minister for Health and Family Welfare, told udaipur kiran.
The government took the ordinance route to ban electronic cigarettes so that their usage didn’t acquire epidemic proportions, especially among the children, adolescent and youth.
The National Health Policy targeted 15 per cent reduction in prevalence of tobacco use by 2020. These new products can severely undermine tobacco control efforts, Health Ministry officials said.
The adverse impact on the economy also prompted the ban on e-cigarettes.
The total economic costs attributable to tobacco use from all diseases in India in 2011 for persons aged 35-69 years amounted to Rs 1.04 lakh crore.
This estimated cost was 1.16 per cent of the GDP and 12 per cent more than the combined state and Central government expenditures on health in 2011-12.
With new forms of nicotine addiction hitting the market, the economic burden is only likely to increase, officials said.
The Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) recommended a complete ban on e-cigarettes and other Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) in May this year.
The government received several representations from reputed medical practitioners, institutions and hospitals who favoured a complete ban on such items. These include Indian Medical Association, AIIMS, Jodhpur, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Devi Shetty, Narayan Hrudayalaya, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute, Delhi, and the Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.
A representation endorsed by 1,061 doctors from all over India also saught a comprehensive ban on e-cigarettes.
All the three sub-groups constituted by the Health Ministry concluded that the ENDS/e-cigarettes should be prohibited in the interest of public health.
The Health Ministry issued an advisory on August 28 last year to the governments of all the states and Union Territories in response to a PIL filed in the Delhi High Court.
Evidence suggests that these products act as gateway products to induce non-smokers — especially the youth and the adolescent — to nicotine use, leading to addiction and subsequently to use of tobacco products.
The trend of a rapid increase in the use of e-cigarettes and like devices by the youth and children in countries where they were introduced is clear.
According to the World Health Organization (WHO) report on Global Tobacco Epidemic (2017), the governments of 30 countries have banned e-cigarettes.
These include Mauritius, Singapore, Korea, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Brazil, Mexico, Uruguay, Bahrain, Iran, Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates, among others.
There have also been recent advisories in the US on e-cigarettes. San Francisco became the first US city to ban the sale of e-cigarettes in January this year.
In August, the New York Health Department issued advisory to inform about an emerging health threat of severe pulmonary disease associated with the use of vape products.
As per the US National Youth Tobacco Survey, e-cigarette use increased by 77.8 per cent among high school students and by 48.5 per cent among middle school students from 2017 to 2018.
According to the US Surgeon General, 1 in every 5 high school students and 1 in every 20 middle school students used e-cigarettes in 2018.
According to health experts, these products are usually marketed as being safer alternatives to conventional cigarettes, but such notions of safety are false.
However, there is no conclusive evidence to support such claims. Safety of flavours in combination with nicotine and other psychoactive substances is also not known.